Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41911290›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Examining epidemiological models and economic analyses of typhoid conjugate vaccine: A scoping review.

Prashant Mandaliya, Stacey Orangi, Jacob Kazungu, Dennis Waithaka, Angela Kairu, Amos Bationo, Felix Masiye, Obinna Onwujekwe, Edwine Barasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Prashant MandaliyaHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8249-746X
Stacey OrangiHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jacob KazunguHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Dennis WaithakaHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Angela KairuHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Amos BationoHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Felix MasiyeDepartment of Economics, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zambia, Zambia.
Obinna OnwujekweDepartments of Health Administration & Management and Pharmacology & Therapeutics, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Edwine BarasaHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Typhoid remains a public health concern across many low- and middle-income countries. This scoping review summarized and mapped evidence from epidemiological models and economic analyses of typhoid conjugate vaccine (TCV). We included studies on the cost of illness of typhoid, the cost of vaccination, cost-effectiveness, and public health impact of TCV. A search was conducted across five databases and followed the Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. We extracted data on the study design, population, outcomes, model parameters, and cost-effectiveness. All reported costs were converted to 2024 United States Dollars (USD) to allow for comparisons across studies. Findings were summarized by key outcomes. The 26 studies included in the review covered Sub-Saharan Africa, South and East Asia, the Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Europe. A total of ten studies reported the cost of treating a typhoid patient, with costs varying based on the hospital setting, geographic location and severity of the disease. Five studies examined the cost of TCV vaccination and delivery reported higher costs for campaigns than routine immunization, with economic costs consistently higher than financial costs. The two public health impact studies predicted case reductions from 2% to 94% and mortality reductions up to 36% or 100%, depending on the vaccine strategy employed. The nine economic evaluations included in the review reported lower incremental cost effectiveness ratios in high-incidence urban settings, with some strategies termed as cost-saving. Cost-effectiveness depends on incidence, perspective, and vaccine strategy, emphasizing the need for context-specific evaluations. Literature shows that the value of TCV is influenced by the disease burden, vaccination costs, and health outcomes, which are context specific. Future research should employ more comprehensive models to better capture TCV's economic and public health value and leverage on local data to give more contextual evidence for policymakers.

Identifiers

PMID41911290
PMCPMC13035140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.