Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41911275›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Can returning home for entrepreneurship improve the agricultural economic resilience: Investigation based on the pilot policy of returning home for entrepreneurship.

Xiaowen Yu, Hongyu Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaowen YuSchool of Management, South Campus, Northwest A&F University School of Economics and Management, Xianyang, China.
Hongyu MaSchool of Management, South Campus, Northwest A&F University School of Economics and Management, Xianyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3718-3942

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the ongoing transition of rural China from a "labor migrant economy" to an "entrepreneurial economy", this study utilizes panel data covering 2005 counties nationwide in China during the period 2012-2022. Employing a Difference-in-Differences (DID) model integrated with a mediating effect approach, this study comprehensively examines the impact of the pilot hometown-return entrepreneurship policy on agricultural economic resilience and its intrinsic mechanisms of action. The results show that agricultural economic resilience exhibits a steady upward trend and significant spatial disparity, characterized by a spatial distribution pattern of "high in the east, low in the west, high in the north, and low in the south". The pilot hometown-return entrepreneurship policy exerts a significantly positive effect on enhancing agricultural economic resilience, with this positive impact being more pronounced in western China and less substantial in eastern China. Mechanism analysis reveals that increasing farmers' income and advancing the rationalization of the industrial structure are the key transmission channels through which the pilot hometown-return entrepreneurship policy enhances agricultural economic resilience. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the extent to which and the mechanisms through which the pilot hometown-return entrepreneurship policy enhances agricultural economic resilience. It is imperative for all regions to continuously strengthen policy support and guidance for returning farmers and enhance regional attractiveness in light of local conditions, thereby fostering the high-quality development of the agricultural economy.

Indexed as

AgricultureEntrepreneurshipChinaFarmersHumansPilot ProjectsRural Population

Identifiers

PMID41911275
PMCPMC13035124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.