Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41911256›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

The impact of ethical implications intertwined with tuberculosis household contact investigation: A qualitative study.

Lebohang M Mlambo, Minja Milovanovic, Colleen F Hanrahan, Kegaugetswe Motsomi, Mashido T Morolo, Mbali M Mohlamonyane, Nicholas W Albaugh, Khatija Ahmed, Neil Martinson, David W Dowdy and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04520113 (Innovative Contact Tracing Strategies for Detecting TB in Mobile Rural and Urban South African Populations), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04520113 nacompletednot on this map

Innovative Contact Tracing Strategies for Detecting TB in Mobile Rural and Urban South African Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2020 to 2025Enrolled10,579ConditionsTuberculosis, HivArmsHousehold contact tracing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lebohang M MlamboPerinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Soweto, South Africa.
Minja MilovanovicPerinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Soweto, South Africa.
Colleen F HanrahanDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Kegaugetswe MotsomiPerinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Soweto, South Africa.
Mashido T MoroloSetshaba Research Centre, Soshanguve, South Africa.
Mbali M MohlamonyanePerinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Soweto, South Africa.
Nicholas W AlbaughDepartment of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Khatija AhmedSetshaba Research Centre, Soshanguve, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0309-1641
Neil MartinsonPerinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Soweto, South Africa.
David W DowdyDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Nora S WestDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8556-1744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHousehold contact investigation (HCI) is an effective and widely used approach to identify persons with tuberculosis (TB) disease and infection globally. Despite widespread recommendations for the use of HCI, there remains poor understanding of the impact on and value of contact investigation for participants. Further, how HCI as a practice impacts psychosocial factors, including stigma and possible unintended disclosure of illness among persons with TB, their families, and communities, is largely unknown.

methodsThis exploratory qualitative study nested within a randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04520113, 17 August 2020) was conducted in South Africa to understand the impacts of HCI on index patients living with TB and their household contact persons in two rural districts in the Limpopo province (Vhembe and Capricorn) and Soshanguve, a peri-urban township in Gauteng province. People with TB and household members of people with TB were recruited to participate in in-depth interviews and focus group discussions using semi-structured guides. We explored individual, interpersonal, and community-level perceptions of potential impacts of household contact investigation to elucidate their perceptions of HCI. Thematic analysis identified key themes.

resultsTwenty-four individual interviews and six focus group discussions (n = 39 participants) were conducted. Participants viewed HCI as an effective approach to finding TB cases, helpful in educating households about TB symptoms and reducing barriers to health-related services. At the interpersonal level, HCI aided people with TB in safely disclosing their TB status to family members and facilitated family and social support for accountability. The introduction of HIV testing during HCI was reported by some participants as making household members slightly uncomfortable, decreasing interest in household members being tested for TB. HCI negatively impacted community-level TB and HIV-related stigma due to healthcare worker visibility at home.

conclusionOur data suggests varying impacts of HCI on people with TB, their families and interpersonal relationships, and communities, highlighting the importance of considering approaches that address concerns about community stigma and HIV testing to enhance acceptance of HCI.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04520113.

Indexed as

Contact TracingTuberculosisAdultFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRural PopulationSocial StigmaSouth AfricaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41911256
PMCPMC13035131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.