ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluation of a training program for rheumatic heart disease screening integrated into the public health system in Uganda.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEchocardiography screening for rheumatic heart disease (RHD) has gained support as a public health approach, but scale up of RHD screening services is complex. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel training program to build non-expert competency for RHD echocardiography screening within the Uganda public health system and to describe the human and material resources required to support it.
methodsGuided by a logic model, we evaluated the Accelerating Delivery of Rheumatic Heart Disease Prevention in Northern Uganda (ADUNU) Program, a novel RHD control program, 15 months after its implementation within the Ugandan public health care system.
resultsSixty-one healthcare workers (HCW) across 10 public health facilities started in training under the program, of which 58 (95%) advanced past the initial stage of training and earned conditional certification to screen for RHD with ongoing remote and in-person feedback and oversight. Of these, 17 (29%) completed all stages of training and earned full certification to independently screen for RHD with no ongoing oversight. A total of 17,927 community members were screened through ADUNU during the program's first 15 months. After receiving final certification, 14 HCWs (93%) continued to perform screening echocardiograms (≥20/month) at median follow-up of 8 months [IQR 8-10]. HCW sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 96%, respectively.
conclusionDevelopment and deployment of a large scale RHD screening echocardiography training program within an existing public health system is feasible. Future program iterations are needed to improve HCW screening sensitivity and decrease the reliance on human resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.