Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41911238›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Dual-channel feature fusion network for sheep diseases question classification.

Gulizada Haisa, Gulimila Kezierbieke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gulizada HaisaCollege of Computer and Information Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0105-1198
Gulimila KezierbiekeCollege of Computer and Information Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the challenges of feature sparsity, semantic ambiguity, and insufficient feature extraction in sheep disease question classification, this paper proposes a novel model named Dual-Channel Feature Fusion Network for Sheep Diseases Question Classification (DFF-SDQC). The model leverages the CINO pre-trained model to generate dynamic word embeddings, thereby enriching semantic representations. Subsequently, global textual features are captured through BiLSTM, while deeper local contextual features are extracted using an attention mechanism. To further enhance the robustness and generalization of the model, a question-word attention mechanism is introduced, enabling the attention matrix to better capture the intentions expressed by interrogative words, thus strengthening the overall feature representation of the question. Finally, dual-channel feature information is fused to obtain the final textual representation. Experimental results on the D-SDQC and D-TQC datasets show that DFF-SDQC achieves an F1-score of 93.18% on D-SDQC, improving 2.22 percentage points over the strongest baseline, demonstrating the effectiveness of the dual-channel fusion and attention design.

Indexed as

Sheep DiseasesAnimalsSemanticsSheep

Identifiers

PMID41911238
PMCPMC13035138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.