ArticlePLoS genetics2026
Mms4 chromosomal association reveals functional relationships between meiotic crossover pathways in budding yeast.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meiotic crossovers are generated from the repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammals, most crossovers are generated through the Class I pathway, involving the mismatch-repair related complex Msh4-Msh5, while a smaller fraction is produced by the Mms4-Mus81 endonuclease (Class II pathway). We present the first report on the genome-wide localization of the Mms4 protein during meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Surprisingly, Mms4 localization showed a trend towards weak DSB sites, unlike the localization of the Class I crossover protein -Msh5, which is biased towards strong DSB sites. This preference for weaker DSB hotspots was retained in a msh5∆ mutant, arguing against competitive models of Mms4 and Msh5 association on meiotic chromosomes. The chromosomal association of Mms4 does not require the formation of meiotic DNA breaks but is facilitated by chromosome axis assembly. These results suggest Mms4 is primarily associated with chromosomal axis regions positioned near recombination intermediates. Mms4 binding is also largely insensitive to heterozygosity, unlike Msh5, consistent with its independence from recombination for localization. Together, these findings support a model in which Mms4-Mus81 enhances the robustness of meiotic recombination with a trend towards binding DSB hotspots that are weaker or are located in regions with sequence divergence that may be processed less efficiently by the Class I pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.