Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41911223›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Assessing Local Differential Privacy for Compliance with the Personal Data Protection Law in Integrated Data Systems.

Randa Aljably

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Randa AljablyCollege of Computer Science and Information Technology, Shaqra University, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6935-0963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organizations increasingly integrate and share person-level data across internal platforms and external partners to enable analytics, digital services, and evidence-based decision making. However, combining quasi-identifiers across systems and releases can enable re-identification via linkage attacks, creating regulatory compliance and trust risks. This paper proposes an operational methodology for (i) identifying direct identifiers and quasi-identifiers (QIs), (ii) quantifying baseline re-identification risk using uniqueness and prosecutor-style risk proxies, and (iii) applying Local Differential Privacy (LDP) to reduce link-ability prior to data sharing. We implement categorical LDP using a Generalized Randomized Response (GRR) mechanism and evaluate privacy-utility trade-offs through a sensitivity analysis over the privacy budget ε. Utility is quantified using (a) distributional distortion (total variation distance) and (b) downstream task performance (job-title classification). We further address reviewer concerns by discussing repeated releases, privacy accounting as mitigations for longitudinal deployments, and by improving figure readability and updating related work with recent studies.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityConfidentialityInformation DisseminationPrivacyHumans

Identifiers

PMID41911223
PMCPMC13035125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.