ArticlePloS one2026
Community readiness for the program of all-inclusive care for the elderly (PACE): A qualitative study with Korean Americans in Los Angeles.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE), which provides integrated medical, social, and personal healthcare to help older adults remain in their homes and communities, has been a successful long-term care services and support (LTSS) model. Yet little is known about how racial and ethnic minority communities perceive and respond to this program. Guided by the Community Readiness Model (CRM), this explorative qualitative study examined readiness for PACE in Korean American communities in Los Angeles. Data were collected from 28 participants, including two focus groups with 19 older adults (age ≥ 55) and nine individual interviews with family caregivers and health and social service providers. Four major themes emerged: (1) Awareness, (2) Perceived Benefits, (3) Perceived Barriers and Concerns, and (4) Recommendations for Implementation and Outreach. In general, awareness of PACE was low among participants, and many had unclear or incorrect understanding of the program. Perceived benefits included the ability to age in place, access to coordinated care at a single setting, opportunities for social engagement, and reduced caregiving burden. Concerns noted by participants included the need to switch physicians, possible disruption of existing services such as In-Home Supportive Services, and uncertainty about the qualifications of PACE providers. Recommendations highlighted the importance of culturally tailored outreach, a more descriptive program name, strong leadership, a cooperative interdisciplinary team culture, and staffing that combines clinical expertise with compassion and cultural sensitivity. These findings suggest that introducing PACE in the Korean American community requires intentional adaptation to address both cultural expectations and structural barriers. This study offers insights into how the PACE model can be more effectively introduced, adapted, and sustained in racial and ethnic minority communities that have not been fully engaged by LTSS outreach and delivery efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.