ArticleRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina)2026
[Real-world evidence on the use of generic tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis]
Article in Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the clinical outcomes of using generic tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who either initiated it de novo or underwent a non-medical switch from the original formulation. Methods: Retrospective cohort of adults with RA who either initiated generic tofacitinib (JANVAX®) or switched from original tofacitinib (XELJANZ®). Patients were followed until treatment discontinuation, death, or end of follow-up (12 months). Effectiveness was assessed using the DAS28-ESR scale via mixed-effects models. The switch group was evaluated at 0, 6, and 12 months; the initiation group at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months. The occurrence of adverse events was assessed for safety. Results: A total of 42 RA patients were included (24 in the switch group and 18 in the initiation group). Nine patients discontinued treatment. In the switch group, DAS28-ESR remained stable (2.96; 3.08; 3.10; p = 0.70). In the initiation group, improvement was significant (5.3, 3.42, 3.49, 3.31; p < 0.001). No major cardiovascular events (MACE) were reported. There was one death of unknown cause, three serious infections, one pulmonary embolism, and one diagnosis of malignancy during follow-up. Conclusions: The non-medical switch to generic tofacitinib and treatment initiation were associated with a good clinical response in terms of effectiveness, with no evidence of new safety concerns. However, the limited sample size calls for further studies to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.