Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41911176›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Vascular age estimation using a consumer wearable sleep tracker.

Gizem Yilmaz, Shohreh Ghorbani, Ju Lynn Ong, Hosein Aghayan Golkashani, Chen Zhang, B T Thomas Yeo, Michael W L Chee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gizem YilmazCentre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4387-9276
Shohreh GhorbaniCentre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ju Lynn OngCentre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Hosein Aghayan GolkashaniCentre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Chen ZhangCentre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
B T Thomas YeoCentre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Michael W L CheeCentre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6087-0548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular aging is traditionally assessed using a combination of clinical markers, blood pressure and arterial stiffness measurement. However, measuring vascular aging with reference equipment is costly and not scalable. Nocturnal photoplethysmography (PPG) from wearable health trackers offer a scalable solution for longitudinal assessment. In this study, we evaluated the ability of a consumer wearable (Oura Ring) to detect age-related differences in PPG waveform, in comparison to a clinical-grade fingertip pulse oximeter. Healthy adults (N = 160; 78 males (49%), median age 31 years (IQR: 23)) underwent overnight polysomnography (PSG) in a sleep laboratory, during which fingertip and wearable ring PPG data were collected simultaneously. Pulse waveforms were extracted from both devices using a custom algorithm and key waveform features were compared across devices. Vascular age was estimated from pulse waveforms using a featureless deep learning model. Prediction performance was compared between the two devices. Age-related waveform changes were most prominent in PPG crest time (CT (samples)) (r = 0.64 and 0.62 for fingertip and wearable devices), while the reflection index (RI) had a weaker correlation with age for the ring sensor (r = 0.22) compared to fingertip (r = 0.58). Despite differences in waveforms between devices, the deep learning model showed comparable prediction performance with mean absolute errors (MAE (SD)) of 6.28 (1.48) and 7.25 (1.29) years, and r (SD) of 0.84 (0.07) and 0.80 (0.10) for clinical-grade and consumer-grade devices, respectively. These findings support the feasibility of using PPG waveforms from wearable devices to assess vascular age.

Identifiers

PMID41911176
PMCPMC13035161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.