ArticleJournal of natural products2026
Activity of Didesmethylrocaglamide in High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Using Preclinical In Vitro and In Vivo Models.
Article in Journal of natural products, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most lethal gynecological cause of death in women and requires new treatments to help tackle chemoresistance. Rocaglamides, a promising class of anticancer natural products, function as protein translation inhibitors and trigger apoptosis in other types of solid tumors. Didesmethylrocaglamide ((±)-DDR), a derivative of rocaglamide with potent antitumor activity, was synthesized, including three additional rocaglamide derivatives, (±)-DDR01, (±)-DDR03, and (±)-DDR04, to evaluate their cytotoxicity in HGSOC. Using in vitro models, it was determined that (±)-DDR induced cytotoxicity in ovarian cancer cell lines as early as 24 h after application and activated caspase-3, indicating pro-apoptotic activity. In addition, (±)-DDR was cytotoxic in the PE04 and MCF7-ADR (OVCAR8-RES) cell lines that are resistant to cisplatin and paclitaxel, respectively. Evaluation of each enantiomer revealed the minus enantiomer to be ∼18-fold more potent compared to the plus enantiomer in the OVCAR8 cell line. (-)-DDR was further evaluated using an OVCAR8 xenograft model in mice, and a reduction in tumor burden was observed. Its effective cytotoxicity in drug-sensitive and -resistant cell models suggests that (±)-DDR and its corresponding minus enantiomer may have potential as a new therapeutic strategy against HGSOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.