ArticleJAMA network open2026
Sex, Race, and Ethnicity Differences Among Residents With Exceptionally High Graduate Medical Education Ratings.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Limited research exists on sex, racial, and ethnic disparities in required graduate medical education (GME) resident competency ratings across specialties during sensitive periods when career decision-making occurs. Rating disparities using an antideficit-based approach measured by exceptionally high ratings are underexplored in GME. Objective: To assess the association of exceptionally high ratings in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones during time-sensitive training periods across specialties with differences among residents' characteristics, including sex, race, and ethnicity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis was conducted between March 15 and December 31, 2025, using 2018 to 2021 Association of American Medical Colleges and ACGME data. Postgraduate year (PGY) 2 residents training at US ACGME-accredited emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, and surgery residency programs between 2018 and 2021 who self-reported sex, race, or ethnicity were studied. Exposure: Required Milestones ratings at the end of PGY-2 training associated with resident sex and race or ethnicity (underrepresented in medicine [URiM] and Asian), while controlling for preresidency Step 2 Clinical Knowledge examination scores. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for exceptionally high resident-level ratings (80th percentile level) across competencies in interpersonal and communication skills, medical knowledge, patient care, practice-based learning and improvement, professionalism, and systems-based practice. Results: Among 19 492 PGY-2 residents across 1754 programs, 10 384 (53.3%) were female, 28 (0.14%) American Indian or Alaskan Native, 4327 (22.2%) Asian, 1106 (5.7%) Black, 1008 (5.2%) Hispanic or Latinx, 3 (0.02%) Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 12 269 (62.9%) White, 751 (3.9%) reporting 2 or more races, and 3423 (17.6%) classified as URiM. Exceptional rating differences were identified by sex, race, and ethnicity. Across all specialties, female residents had greater odds for 80th percentile ratings (AOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.21; P < .001); whereas when compared with White residents, URiM residents (AOR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.62-0.76; P < .001) and Asian residents (AOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.74; P < .001) were less likely to have 80th percentile ratings than White residents. Within specialties, URiM residents in emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, and surgery were less likely to have 80th percentile ratings, whereas Asian residents in family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, and surgery were also less likely than White residents. Conclusion and Relevance: In this cross-sectional national study of residents, exceptionally higher ratings were associated with differing resident characteristics during crucial career planning phases. These results suggest the need for more studies to explore factors of resident success during GME training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.