ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2026
The Evolving Role of Genomic Technologies in Multiple Myeloma: Implications for Diagnosis, Risk Stratification and Resistance.
Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plasma cell disorders range from indolent precursors to aggressive malignancies, with multiple myeloma as the most common malignant form. Multiple myeloma biology is highly complex and driven by genomic heterogeneity. Although recent genomic advances offer increasingly precise treatment strategies, routinely used conventional diagnostic methods sometimes fail to reflect the evolution of up-to-date multiple myeloma risk stratification models, and the implementation of genomic discoveries into clinical guidelines is hindered. We reviewed the current state and emerging roles of genomic diagnostics in multiple myeloma and related conditions, emphasizing the clinical utility. We summarized clinical presentation and diagnostic criteria, mapped the mutational landscape across disease stages, and tracked the evolution of risk stratification from clinical staging to integrated genomic models. We also highlighted recent recommendations that incorporate a quantitative assessment of cytogenetic abnormalities and tumor suppressor gene mutations. Further, we compared routinely used and state-of-the-art technologies including fluorescence in situ hybridization, targeted gene panels, whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing, long-read platforms, optical genome mapping, and analyses of circulating tumor DNA, focusing on their strengths, limitations, and complementary roles in the baseline work-up, longitudinal monitoring, and detection of resistance. Last, we discussed practical barriers to implementation and proposed a framework for proactive integration of novel approaches into clinics. In summary, comprehensive genomic profiling is becoming central to modern multiple myeloma diagnostics and a key step for precise and personalized medicine that will, if integrated into routine care, enable a more precise risk assessment, earlier detection of relapse, and improved therapy selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.