ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2026
A new murine gram-negative sepsis model with standard care satisfies Sepsis-3 and reproduces clinical pathology.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis accounts for approximately a third of global mortality, and significant morbidity and economic burden. Whilst the current Sepsis-3 definition has augmented patient identification, supportive care and survival, a lack of clinically relevant animal models has limited our understanding of sepsis disease dynamics over time. Specifically, key knowledge gaps in chronic pathology underpinning the mechanisms leading to organ dysfunction and mortality rates of sepsis survivors have hindered the development of effective therapeutics. Therefore, we developed a new mouse model of abdominal gram-negative sepsis that adheres to Sepsis-3 definitions and expert-led consensus criteria for preclinical sepsis models.
resultsWe tested multiple live strains of Escherichia coli with only clinical isolates causing lethality. Subsequent standard care including broad-spectrum antibiotics and fluid resuscitation reduced the mortality rate to approximately 24 ± 9.3% (SEM), corroborating clinical observations. Early sepsis disease 12 h post-infection was characterized by cytokine storm, with concentrations of IFN-γ, CCL2, IL-6, IL-17A, IL-1α, IL-10 and M-CSF significantly elevated in multiple tissues up to 7 days post-infection when mice had recovered from objective clinical measures of disease. Furthermore, we observed histological evidence of organ dysfunction in the liver, spleen and kidney at 12 h to 3 days post-infection, validating concurrently increased serum markers of organ damage in our model. Additionally, infected mice treated with standard care exhibited persistent haematological dysfunction, as evidenced by anaemia, thrombocytosis and neutrophilia, at recovery from organ dysfunction 7 days post-infection, features similarly observed in clinical sepsis patients.
conclusionsOur new abdominal gram-negative murine sepsis model recapitulates key disease outcomes observed in sepsis patients and allows the study of dysfunctional homeostasis in surviving animals. This model can be utilized to identify and test new therapeutics for abdominal gram-negative sepsis or investigate novel mechanisms of immune dysfunction in sepsis survivors. Modifications to our murine model by utilizing alternate clinical pathogens, routes of infection, and mixed-sex, outbred or aged mice are necessary to recapitulate clinical sepsis heterogeneity and address the inherent limitations of preclinical models. Here, our methodology to establish a model with clinical isolates, satisfaction of Sepsis-3 definitions and preclinical sepsis guidelines provides a framework for the development of future models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.