Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41910917›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026

Development and Validation of Multinomial Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Algorithms for Identifying Refractive Status in Chinese School Aged Children.

Bingjie Wang, Rajeev K Naidu, Mark Hanly, Pauline Kang, Xiaoqian Wang, Kathleen Watt, Zhi Chen

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bingjie Wang *School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8187-8058
Rajeev K Naidu *Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2314-0623
Mark HanlyCentre for Big data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9279-7453
Pauline KangSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3969-2871
Xiaoqian WangJiangyin Bright Eye Hospital, Jiangyin, Jiangsu, China.
Kathleen WattSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0902-731X
Zhi ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Key Laboratory of Myopia, Ministry of Health, Fudan University Eye & ENT Hospital, Shanghai, China. peter459@aliyun.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9038-4831

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFC2510800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and validate models to identify pre-myopic children from their myopic and hyperopic peers using ocular biometry and demographic data.

methodsMultinomial logistic regression (MLR) and machine learning algorithms (random forest and extreme gradient boosting) were applied to data from a school vision screening programme conducted by a private eye hospital in China. The dataset included cycloplegic refraction, ocular biometry and basic demographic information from 36,925 children aged 6-15.99 years. Features were axial length (AL), keratometry, axial length/corneal radius of curvature ratio (AL/CR), gender and age. A penalised MLR with L1 (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; LASSO) regularisation was used to identify the optimal features, followed by model refinement using likelihood ratio tests and Akaike Information Criterion comparisons to assess interaction terms. Refractive status was classified into three groups: myopic (spherical equivalent refractive error [SER] ≤ -0.50D), hyperopic (SER > +0.75D) and pre-myopic (remaining SER values). Class weighting was applied to the pre-myopic group to prioritise its detection. The dataset was split into 80% training and 20% testing. An additional subgroup of younger age children (6-9.99 years) was used to develop an age-specific model.

resultsOnly the right eye data were used. The optimal model included AL, AL/CR, age, gender and a significant three-way interaction between age, gender and AL/CR. MLR achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.874 in the younger age model and 0.899 in the all-age model. For pre-myopic class detection, the younger age model had 80.6% sensitivity, 60.8% specificity and an AUC of 0.768. The all-age model had 81.5% sensitivity, 71.9% specificity and an AUC of 0.839. Overall, MLR performed similarly or better than the other models.

conclusionOcular biometry combined with demographic data enables detection of pre-myopia in school-aged children and may support its incorporation into population-based vision screening programmes.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMyopiaRefraction, OcularRefractive ErrorsVision ScreeningAdolescentBiometryChildChinaClassification AlgorithmsEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMalePrediction AlgorithmsAxial lengthMultinomial logistic regressionMyopia preventionOcular biometryPre-myopia

Identifiers

PMID41910917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.