ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Keypoint detection network for needle localization on intra-procedural MRI in MRI-guided liver interventions.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSegmentation neural networks have demonstrated promising results for interventional needle localization on MRI. However, these networks require large training datasets with tedious annotation processes and additional post-processing steps that may introduce variability in the final localization results. This study aimed to develop keypoint detection networks for direct localization of the needle entry point and tip on intra-procedural liver MRI with a more efficient annotation process and more robust performance.
methods2D and 3D keypoint detection networks were developed by enhancing the stacked hourglass model and incorporating multi-task learning of predicting part affinity fields that connect the keypoints. The proposed networks were evaluated on intra-procedural single-slice controlled-breathing (SS-CB) and multislice controlled-breathing (MS-CB) images acquired from pre-clinical MRI-guided percutaneous liver intervention in thirteen in vivo pig subjects and compared with the results of segmentation-based UNet and Swin Transformer networks and human intra-reader variation.
resultsThe 2D and 3D keypoint detection networks achieved median needle tip and axis localization errors of 1.56 mm (1 pixel) and 1.1° for the SS-CB datasets, and 2.21 mm (~ 1.5 pixel) and 1.45° for the MS-CB datasets, respectively. Average computational times were 10 ms (2D) and 30 ms (3D). The needle localization accuracy of the keypoint networks was significantly (Wilcoxon signed-rank tests p < 0.001) higher than the UNet and Swin Transformer segmentation-based results and comparable to human intra-reader variation.
conclusionThe proposed keypoint detection networks achieved rapid pixel-level needle localization on single-slice and multislice intra-procedural liver MRI with higher accuracy and a more efficient annotation process compared to segmentation-based models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.