ArticleHealth economics review2026
Protecting healthcare workers? Effects of a multilevel intervention targeting emotional demands.
Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare workers are frequently exposed to high emotional demands through encounters with patient suffering, death, worries, and aggressive reactions. Such demands have been linked to an elevated risk of mental health problems, particularly depression. Despite growing recognition of these challenges, evidence on the effectiveness of workplace interventions remains limited. This study evaluates the impact of a multilevel intervention implemented in a Danish hospital to prevent and reduce the adverse consequences of emotional demands.
methodsWe used nationwide register data and a difference-in-differences design to estimate the effect of the intervention, which was introduced on 1 January 2021 and lasted three years. The study population comprised all employees at the intervention hospital and comparable control hospitals from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2023. The outcomes were healthcare costs related to general practitioner services and a composite measure capturing costs related to mental healthcare in primary care and redeemed prescriptions for antidepressant and anxiolytic medications. Marginal effects of the intervention were obtained from two-part models combining probit or logistic regression to estimate the probability of incurring any healthcare costs and generalised estimating equations to model costs conditional on positive values.
resultsOur findings show no overall effect of the intervention on healthcare costs. However, subgroup analyses suggest heterogeneous effects across groups of healthcare employees, including indications of cost-reducing effects on minor mental healthcare costs among nurses and on general practitioner-related costs among doctors.
conclusionThe intervention produced no measurable overall effects on healthcare costs; however, the limited statistical power to detect small overall effects means that modest intervention impacts cannot be ruled out. These findings highlight the need for further research on strategies to prevent and manage emotional demands at work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.