Observational studyEmergency radiology2026
Occult fractures in low-energy trauma-A retrospective forensic case series.
Observational study in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOccult fractures (OFs) are inapparent fractures on initial plain radiographs, retrospectively diagnosed through second level imaging. The reasons for further diagnostic investigation may be the persistence of symptoms, or various personal needs, including insurance related. OFs, typically associated with low-energy trauma, are often underdiagnosed in the acute phase; however, they are relevant in the medico-legal field, as failure to identify them or delays in diagnosis and treatment may determine disability and give rise to complaint. Authors aim to describe OFs observed in a forensic case series.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on technical expert consultations carried out between 2018 and 2024. Patients who sustained low-energy trauma with no evidence of fracture on plain radiography, followed by a later diagnosis of OF, were enrolled. Informed consent was signed. In each case, demographic data, trauma characteristics, diagnostic timelines, fracture locations, and details of any compensation claims were collected.
results312 cases of OFs were included, with a prevalence at the sacrum (29.5%), posterior pelvic ring (18.8%), carpal scaphoid (16.0%). In 68.5% of cases, the diagnostic delay exceeded 15 days. More than two thirds of the anatomical sites involved by OFs typically require conservative therapeutical management. In 41.3% of occult fracture cases, a claim for alleged malpractice compensation was filed, in 23.7% claiming an increased damage due to diagnostic-therapeutic delay. Failure to recommend clinical-radiological follow-up, as well as inadequate documentation of signs and symptoms and of trauma dynamics, were also found.
conclusionsOccult fractures represent a critical issue in medico-legal practice as the increasing time from trauma to diagnosis may lead to litigation. The adoption of diagnostic protocols for low-energy trauma in selected settings that account for the risk of occult fractures, together with enhanced clinical assessment and documentation, is essential to prevent complaints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.