ArticleClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2026
From "evidence is scarce" to trial-ready care pathways in POTS: an audit-ready roadmap prompted by Schiweck et al.
Article in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) represents a growing clinical and public health challenge, particularly in the context of post-infectious and post-COVID-19 syndromes. Recent systematic synthesis highlights that, despite widespread clinical use of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions, high-certainty randomized evidence remains scarce and heterogeneous. In this correspondence, prompted by contemporary treatment reviews, we argue that the primary limitation is no longer the absence of therapies but the absence of decision-grade trial architecture. We propose an audit-ready, globally scalable framework that integrates phenotype-stratified pragmatic trials, platform-based comparative effectiveness designs, and a minimum core outcome set anchored to minimally clinically important differences. Emphasis is placed on patient-relevant functional recovery, interpretability across health systems, and equitable implementation beyond tertiary autonomic centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41910866What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.