Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41910859›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2026

Regulatory Perspectives for Gambling in Brazil: are there Lessons that can be Learned from the UK´s Experience?

Eduardo Rocha Dias, Steve Greenfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eduardo Rocha DiasUniversidade de Fortaleza-UNIFOR, Avenida Washington Soares, Fortaleza, 1321, CEP 60811-905, CE, Brazil. eduardorochadias@unifor.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0972-354X
Steve GreenfieldUniversity of Westminster, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5566-0239

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following recent enactment of online gambling regulations in Brazil, this commentary aims to compare the country´s policies with those of the UK, where the Gambling Act has been in force since 2005. Brazil followed a trend that falls within the recent global expansion of the gambling industry, although having an internal dynamic of its own The key question for those jurisdictions exploring deregulation or who have already ventured down that path is how a regulatory framework can reconcile the ‘harm’ that accompanies the increased freedom to gamble alongside the economic benefits that choice generates. This is a clear obstacle to framing policy in public health terms as opposed to one based on market freedom. The ongoing experience of Brazil demonstrates that, despite the wealth of evidence relating to gambling harms from the UK, the embracing of a neo-liberal approach still resonates. Regulators in Brazil and beyond need to be critically aware of the resistance to introducing new restrictions, from the gambling companies themselves, and respond accordingly.

Indexed as

GamblingGovernment RegulationPublic PolicyBehavior, AddictiveBrazilHumansUnited KingdomBrazilGambling harmsGambling regulationSocial determinants of gamblingUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID41910859
PMCPMC13269285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.