ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2026
Mechanical behavior of human breast tissues: ex vivo and in silico characterization.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To study the mechanics of a biological tissue is crucial to understand its behavior under a variety of realistic loading conditions. In particular, an accurate estimation of the mechanical properties of breast tissues is essential to enhance current diagnostic techniques, such as mammography, and to improve clinical treatments, including tissue engineering approaches. This study focuses on the mechanical characterization of human breast tissues, harvested from women who underwent a mammary reduction surgery. Ex vivo experiments, consisted in indentation tests, were performed to determine the elastic properties. Additionally, using inverse finite element analysis, the hyperelastic properties were obtained for the Yeoh and Ogden (N = 3) constitutive models. The samples were grouped based on the characteristics of the female population (i.e., age, body mass index and menopausal status) and according to the breast side (tissue sample site). Significant differences in the Young's modulus were only observed in association with age and menopausal status, in the first linear region (3.75-11.5% strain) of the experimental curve. In the second linear region (22.5-30% strain), although samples presented a higher stiffness, no significant differences were observed. Regarding the hyperelastic properties, Yeoh and Ogden (N = 3) models accurately fit the experimental data, presenting errors lower than 3.26% and 3.86%, respectively. In this work, the model developed successfully converged with a 3 mm of indentation (corresponding to 30% of deformation), enabling reliable analysis in the large deformations domain. The findings of this study provide valuable insights that can contribute to future clinical applications and research, including improvements in diagnostic techniques, treatments and esthetic reconstructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.