Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41910811›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2026

Retrospective attention suppresses reward-associated interference in visual working memory.

Yaya Zhang, Shuya Lei, Gongao Li, Xuezhu Hu, Jinhong Ding

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yaya ZhangSchool of Psychology, Capital Normal University, No.105, North Road of Western 3rd-Ring, 100048, Beijing, China.
Shuya LeiSchool of Psychology, Capital Normal University, No.105, North Road of Western 3rd-Ring, 100048, Beijing, China.
Gongao LiSchool of Psychology, Capital Normal University, No.105, North Road of Western 3rd-Ring, 100048, Beijing, China.
Xuezhu HuSchool of Psychology, Capital Normal University, No.105, North Road of Western 3rd-Ring, 100048, Beijing, China.
Jinhong DingSchool of Psychology, Capital Normal University, No.105, North Road of Western 3rd-Ring, 100048, Beijing, China. dingjh@cnu.edu.cn.

Funding

Zhejiang Provincial Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project (Special Program on Ideological and Political Work in Higher Education Institutions) 26GXSZ032YB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrospective cues are thought to prioritize goal-relevant representations in visual working memory, yet whether they actively suppress interference from reward-associated non-targets remains unclear. We combined a reward-association training phase with a retro-cue paradigm across two eye-tracking experiments to test how retrospective attention regulates value-driven distraction within memory. When non-reward stimuli were absent during training (Experiment 1), high-reward items produced smaller adjustment errors, lower guess rates, and higher precision than low-reward items, with no reliable target-non-target difference, indicating strong value-based competition. When non-reward stimuli were included during training (Experiment 2), high-low reward differences disappeared, whereas targets outperformed non-targets on error and precision, consistent with retro-cue-based selection. Microsaccade analyses showed that, irrespective of training, post-cue gaze dynamics favored targets. Critically, in Experiment 1, when reward stimuli served as non-targets, microsaccades were less frequently directed toward high-reward than low-reward distractors, providing direct oculomotor evidence for suppression of value-laden interference; this difference was absent in Experiment 2. Together, these results indicate that retrospective attention suppresses reward-associated interference within working memory, and that this suppression is gated by stimulus novelty introduced during training. The findings link behavioral precision and oculomotor dynamics to an active suppression mechanism that controls value-driven distraction after encoding, offering a principled account of how internal attention resolves competition among mnemonic representations.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, Short-TermRewardVisual PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.