ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Validation of an enhanced pediatric vitamin D deficiency score incorporating sun exposure timing and BMI z-score: analysis in a combined cohort of children.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early identification of vitamin D (VitD) deficiency in childhood is essential to support timely prevention and intervention strategies. Building on the previously validated pediatric EVIDENCe-Q questionnaire, this study aimed to refine the tool by integrating two patient-specific weighted variables, sun exposure during peak UVB hours, and BMI z-score categories, both recognized determinants of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) levels. A total of 354 children (190F/164 M) completed a 20-item pediatric VitD risk questionnaire. Serum 25-OH-D concentrations were available for 280 participants. Three scoring algorithms were evaluated: the unweighted standard model, the sun-weighted model, and the sun + BMI-weighted model. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, Pearson correlations, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses across biochemical thresholds of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency (< 10, < 20, and < 30 ng/mL). Vitamin D deficiency (< 10 ng/mL) was observed in 6.8% of participants, while insufficiency affected 38.1% (< 20 ng/mL) and 74.7% (< 30 ng/mL). The unweighted standard model did not discriminate among vitamin D categories (p = 0.622). In contrast, both weighted models showed significant discrimination (sun-weighted: p = 0.036; sun + BMI-weighted: p = 0.030). Only the sun + BMI-weighted model was significantly correlated with serum 25-OH-D levels (r = - 0.13; p = 0.023). ROC analyses demonstrated limited accuracy for the unweighted model, whereas the weighted models showed moderate discriminatory ability, with the Sun + BMI-Weighted Model providing the strongest overall performance.
conclusionsIncorporating weighted patient-specific variables improves the discriminatory capacity of the pediatric EVIDENCe-Q. Despite moderate accuracy, particularly at lower thresholds, the refined questionnaire, especially the sun + BMI-weighted version, represents a practical, noninvasive screening tool to identify children at risk of hypovitaminosis D. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent in children worldwide, even in sun-rich regions, and is influenced by factors such as sun exposure and adiposity. • Serum 25-OH-D measurement is the diagnostic gold standard, while questionnaire-based tools offer a non-invasive but currently less accurate alternative in pediatrics. WHAT IS NEW: • Incorporating weighted factors for peak UVB sun exposure and BMI z-score signifi cantly improves the predictive performance of the pediatric EVIDENCe-Q. • The Sun + BMI-weighted model shows a significant correlation with serum 25-OH-D and enhances identification of children at risk of hypovitaminosis D (30 ng/mL).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.