Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41910783›Full record

ArticleArchives of women's mental health2026

Interpretable prediction of anxiety symptoms during pregnancy via machine learning and SHAP.

Yao Xu, Qingwen Nie, Yanshan Lin, Yanxuan Xiao, Fang Liu, Xiaoqin Ouyang, Shuang Liu, Huiming Yang, Chengcheng Li, Chaoqun Xiao and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yao Xu *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine; The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China.
Qingwen Nie *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine; The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China.
Yanshan LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine; The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China.
Yanxuan XiaoSchool of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Fang LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510515, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoqin OuyangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510515, Guangzhou, China.
Shuang LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510515, Guangzhou, China.
Huiming YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510515, Guangzhou, China.
Chengcheng LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510515, Guangzhou, China.
Chaoqun XiaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 510515, Guangzhou, China. 183151542@qq.com.
Zhijian WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine; The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China. wzjnfyy@163.com.

Funding

Guangzhou Health Science and Technology General Guidance Program 20261A010097High-Level Talent Fund of Guangzhou Medical University 06-445-1196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePerinatal anxiety severely impacts maternal and infant health, yet efficient screening remains a challenge. This study aims to create a clinically interpretable screening framework by employing a machine learning (ML) model explained via Shapley additive explanations (SHAP).

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2022 and August 2023 at a tertiary teaching hospital in Guangzhou, China. We assessed pregnant women for prenatal anxiety symptoms via the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). Four ML models—random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN)—were trained and evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation with a 7:3 train‒test split. Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and SHAP values were used to interpret feature contributions.

resultsWe screened 3141 participants via the GAD-7 and identified 318 with prenatal anxiety symptoms, yielding an incidence of 10.1%. The variables most strongly associated with anxiety were selected from 30 candidate variables by using the Boruta algorithm. XGBoost achieved the highest discriminative performance (AUC = 0.712), slightly outperforming RF (AUC = 0.711) and SVM (AUC = 0.633). The KNN model showed near-random performance (AUC = 0.509). SHAP analysis identified sleep quality, premenstrual tension, age, personality, spousal and mother‑daughter‑in‑law relationship quality, occupation, education, dietary habits, and stressful life events as key factors associated with antenatal anxiety symptoms.

conclusionsThe XGBoost model demonstrated acceptable accuracy for identifying antenatal anxiety symptoms. SHAP-based interpretability helps highlight high-impact psychosocial and lifestyle factors, offering a potential tool for early identification and prevention strategies in obstetric care.

Indexed as

AnxietyMachine LearningPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeopleAdultBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsChinaClassification AlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeneralized Anxiety DisorderHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPregnancyRandom ForestMachine learningPrenatal anxiety symptomsScreening modelSHAP value

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.