ArticleArchives of microbiology2026
Genome-wide comparative and taxonomic characterization of prophages in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen whose genome evolution is shaped in part by mobile genetic elements, including prophages. Here, we analyzed 320 S. maltophilia genomes and identified 880 intact prophages, ranging from 4,557 to 68,546 bp with GC contents of 49.98–67.22%. Prophage prevalence varied across multilocus sequence types (MLST), with ST14 exhibiting the highest prophage intensity (mean intact prophages per genome), indicating lineage-specific differences in prophage acquisition and retention. Taxonomic classification revealed Caudoviricetes as the dominant class (739/880, 84.0%), followed by Faserviricetes (141/880, 16.0%). Functional annotation identified prophage structural genes and virulence-associated homologs, including clpC (n = 15), clpP (n = 37), phoP (n = 15), pilZ (n = 2), and fpvA (n = 1), with only one intact prophage carrying tet(C). These findings highlight extensive prophage diversity, dominated by Caudoviricetes, and reveal lineage-specific variation in prophage carriage, providing genome-scale insights into their composition and potential role in S. maltophilia genome evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41910776What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.