Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41910758›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2026

[ADHS in transition: how can continuity in treatment succeed?]

Sarah Hohmann, Alexandra Philipsen

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah HohmannKlinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, -psychotherapie und -psychosomatik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. s.hohmann@uke.de.
Alexandra PhilipsenKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie- und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transition from child and adolescent to adult psychiatric care constitutes a high-risk period for young people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD). Differences in healthcare service structures, therapeutic concepts and responsibility allocation frequently result in discontinuity and termination of treatment.

aimTo summarize key challenges of ADHD transition and derive practice-oriented recommendations to improve continuity of care. MATERIAL AND

methodsNarrative review of current guidelines (AWMF, NICE), relevant empirical literature and qualitative studies addressing patient, family and clinician perspectives.

resultsMajor barriers include limited patient knowledge of ADHD, marked organizational difficulties, insufficient intersectoral coordination, lack of awareness of adult services and regional shortages of specialized ADHD care. Divergent treatment cultures and the abrupt reduction of parental involvement further complicate the process. DISCUSSION: The ADHD is a persistent neurodevelopmental disorder requiring age-spanning, continuous care. Effective transition depends on structured procedures, reliable communication between services, developmentally adjusted family involvement and specialized treatment options. Future models should integrate developmental and autonomy-focused approaches from pediatric, juvenile and adult psychiatry.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityContinuity of Patient CareTransition to Adult CareAdolescentAdultChildGermanyHumansTreatment OutcomeADHDCooperationFamilyHealthcare serviceTransition

Identifiers

PMID41910758
PMCPMC13171936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.