Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41910749›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Arabic Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS-AR) for patients with lower back pain: a prospective cross-sectional observational study.

Marc Boutros, Guy Awad, Caren Hassan, Shaza Hammad, Zina Smadi, Rami Rachkidi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marc BoutrosSaint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon. marceboutros@gmail.com.
Guy AwadSaint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Caren HassanSaint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Shaza HammadSaint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Zina SmadiTexas Children's Hospital, Houston, USA.
Rami RachkidiHôtel-Dieu de France, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess functional disability related to lower back pain. However, no validated Arabic version has been available, limiting monitoring in Arabic-speaking populations.

methodsA prospective cross-sectional observational validation study was conducted to translate and validate the Arabic version of the QBPDS (QBPDS-AR) according to established cross-cultural adaptation guidelines. The process included independent forward translations, reconciliation, blinded back-translations, expert committee review, pilot testing, and final proofreading. Adults aged eighteen years or older presenting with lower back pain or related functional impairment were consecutively recruited from two outpatient orthopedic clinics in Beirut, Lebanon, between January 2024 and January 2026, and completed the QBPDS-AR and the Arabic Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS-AR). A clinically stable subgroup (no treatment change/surgery) completed the QBPDS-AR again after 5–10 days. Psychometric evaluation included interpretability through floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha, test–retest reliability using ICC(2,1), measurement error including standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change, exploratory factor analysis, and convergent validity with the CPGS-AR.

resultsA total of 516 patients were enrolled and included in the main analyses, of whom 104 clinically stable participants completed the retest assessment. The QBPDS-AR demonstrated excellent internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.947 and strong test–retest reliability with ICC(2,1) of 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.97). The standard error of measurement was 4.98, and the minimal detectable change for an individual was 13.80 points on the 0–100 scale. Floor and ceiling effects remained below the predefined 15% threshold. Exploratory factor analysis supported essential unidimensionality, with the first factor explaining 50.21% of the variance. Convergent validity showed strong correlations with CPGS-AR disability and pain intensity scores.

conclusionThe QBPDS-AR demonstrated excellent reliability, validity, and interpretability, representing the first formally translated and validated Arabic version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale for Arabic-speaking populations.

Indexed as

Arabic validationLower back painPatient-reported outcome measuresPsychometric properties.Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.