ReviewCurrent medical science2026
Strategies for Evading Cellular Immunity Against Recombinant AAV Vectors in Gene Therapy.
Review in Current medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decade, adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors have emerged as a powerful tool for in vivo gene transfer, owing to their diverse tissue tropisms, predominantly non-integrative property, and superior safety profile compared with other viral vectors. As of December 2025, ten gene therapies based on recombinant AAV (rAAV) vectors have been approved globally, primarily by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the European Medicines Agency (EMA). However, seroprevalence surveys indicate that most individuals carry anti-AAV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), and nearly 50% of healthy individuals exhibit detectable frequencies of circulating AAV capsid-specific CD8
Indexed as
Identifiers
41910720What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.