ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Evaluation of a Clinic-Level Intervention to Increase Anxiety and Depression Screening in an Urban HIV Clinic.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anxiety and depression are common in people living with HIV and associated with low antiretroviral treatment adherence, elevated HIV viral load, and increased mortality. Yet, anxiety and depression are underdiagnosed and undertreated in this population. Implementing a system for routine anxiety and depression screening may overcome barriers to diagnosis. To improve the identification and management of anxiety and depression within an HIV clinic, we engaged HIV clinicians in the design of the workflow, created electronic health record reminders for screening, and trained medical assistants to deliver the screening questions at clinic visits. We evaluated this 24-month quality improvement project using electronic health record data and clinician surveys. From November 2020 to October 2022, 747 patients had 1166 appointments during which anxiety and/or depression screening was due. During year one, anxiety and depression screening were completed at 75% (311/416) and 77% (362/469) of eligible encounters, respectively. During year two, screening was completed at 85% of encounters for anxiety (425/502) and depression (446/524). On average, anxiety screening increased by 2.2% per month (t = 4.24, p < 0.001), and depression screening increased by 1.2% per month (t = 2.82, p = 0.01) after intervention implementation. Patients who screened positive received follow-up. Clinician satisfaction with screening processes increased from baseline to 6 months. Findings suggest that screening for anxiety and depression can improve detection and management in an HIV clinic, while also being acceptable to HIV clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.