Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41910622›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026

Electronic structure dictates performance: why Mg-MOF-74 outperforms its peers in direct air capture of CO₂.

Sarah A Johnson, John O Anyanwu, Kanayo L Oguzie, Emeka E Oguzie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah A JohnsonAfrica Centre of Excellence in Future Energies and Electrochemical Systems (ACE-FUELS), Federal University of Technology, Owerri (FUTO), Owerri, Nigeria.
John O AnyanwuAfrica Centre of Excellence in Future Energies and Electrochemical Systems (ACE-FUELS), Federal University of Technology, Owerri (FUTO), Owerri, Nigeria.
Kanayo L OguzieAfrica Centre of Excellence in Future Energies and Electrochemical Systems (ACE-FUELS), Federal University of Technology, Owerri (FUTO), Owerri, Nigeria.
Emeka E OguzieAfrica Centre of Excellence in Future Energies and Electrochemical Systems (ACE-FUELS), Federal University of Technology, Owerri (FUTO), Owerri, Nigeria. emeka.oguzie@futo.edu.ng.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe urgent need for scalable direct air capture (DAC) technologies is hindered by the lack of adsorbents that efficiently capture CO₂ from ambient air. While metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) such as the M-MOF-74 series show promise, a systematic electronic-level comparison of their DAC suitability is lacking. This study fills that gap by a systematic, electronic-level comparison of five M-MOF-74 variants (Mg, Ni, Co, Mn, Zn) using integrated DFT-GCMC analysis, establishing a clear structure-property relationship for DAC. Results identify Mg-MOF-74 as the optimal candidate, achieving the highest CO₂ uptake (5.03 mmol/g) and strongest binding energy (34.3 kJ/mol), which are attributed to its favorable electronic structure and open metal sites. We identify an optimal electronic configuration, moderate band gap, clear valence band maximum-conduction band minimum separation, and well-defined adsorption sites, which maximizes strong, selective physisorption at open metal sites. The work thus provides a blueprint for targeted material design, though the moisture sensitivity of Mg-MOF-74 underscores the need for hydrophobic functionalization in practical applications.

methodsDensity functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using the Dmol

Indexed as

CO₂ adsorptionDFTDirect air captureElectronic structureGCMCMOF-74

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.