ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2026
More than a drop of blood: the paradigm shift of a large-volume capillary sample for point-of-care clinical diagnostics.
Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The validation of a large-volume fingerstick sample for the newly Food and Drug Administration-authorized Xpert HCV test has created an important precedent for the use of a large-volume capillary blood sample for point-of-care (POC) testing. This advance opens the door to the development and deployment of a wide range of POC tests utilizing large-volume capillary samples, including tests that require larger sample volumes for detection of low-concentration analytes. Multiple tools for production and collection of large-volume capillary samples now exist, including many tools designed for yielding blood from capillaries in the upper arm. Most of these tools yield blood that demonstrates excellent concordance with venous blood on testing across a range of analytes, though analytes like potassium and platelets remain challenging for the arm-based tools, and data for molecular analytes are limited overall. Tools capable of separating liquid plasma from large-volume capillary whole blood samples for POC testing remain an elusive but critical goal. Understanding the regulatory expectations for pairing large-volume sample production tools and collection containers with POC testing devices will facilitate both uptake of large-volume collection strategies and POC blood test development, particularly because allowing multiple POC tests to be performed from one large-volume capillary sample would substantially improve the patient experience. Large-volume capillary blood collection is a new frontier key to the future of POC diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.