Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41910266›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2026

More than a drop of blood: the paradigm shift of a large-volume capillary sample for point-of-care clinical diagnostics.

Gregory L Damhorst, Anuradha Rao, Nira R Pollock

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gregory L DamhorstDivision of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2237-1713
Anuradha RaoDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6600-0677
Nira R PollockDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6396-2915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The validation of a large-volume fingerstick sample for the newly Food and Drug Administration-authorized Xpert HCV test has created an important precedent for the use of a large-volume capillary blood sample for point-of-care (POC) testing. This advance opens the door to the development and deployment of a wide range of POC tests utilizing large-volume capillary samples, including tests that require larger sample volumes for detection of low-concentration analytes. Multiple tools for production and collection of large-volume capillary samples now exist, including many tools designed for yielding blood from capillaries in the upper arm. Most of these tools yield blood that demonstrates excellent concordance with venous blood on testing across a range of analytes, though analytes like potassium and platelets remain challenging for the arm-based tools, and data for molecular analytes are limited overall. Tools capable of separating liquid plasma from large-volume capillary whole blood samples for POC testing remain an elusive but critical goal. Understanding the regulatory expectations for pairing large-volume sample production tools and collection containers with POC testing devices will facilitate both uptake of large-volume collection strategies and POC blood test development, particularly because allowing multiple POC tests to be performed from one large-volume capillary sample would substantially improve the patient experience. Large-volume capillary blood collection is a new frontier key to the future of POC diagnostics.

Indexed as

Blood Specimen CollectionPoint-of-Care SystemsPoint-of-Care TestingSpecimen HandlingCapillariesHumansRapid Diagnostic Testsblood collectioncapillarydiagnosticsfingersticklancetpoint-of-care

Identifiers

PMID41910266
PMCPMC13170313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.