Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41910230›Full record

ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2026

Efficacy of Conservative Approaches on the Physio-Mechanical Properties of Caries Lesions Remineralized with Silver Diamine Fluoride.

Sarah S Al-Angari, Ali Alrahlah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah S Al-Angari
Ali Alrahlah

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSilver diamine fluoride (SDF) is a proven caries-arresting agent, but its clinical acceptance is limited by the black staining of treated lesions. This purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of potassium iodide (KI), bleaching, microabrasion, and their combinations on the average surface roughness (Ra) and shear bond strength (SBS) of SDF-stained remineralized caries-like lesions (s-RCLs). MATERIALS AND

methodsHuman enamel slabs were demineralized and randomized into six groups (n = 17): G1, no treatment; G2, treated with 38% SDF to create s-RCLs; G3, s-RCLs+KI; G4, s-RCLs+KI+bleaching; G5, s-RCLs+KI+microabrasion, and G6, s-RCLs+KI+microabrasion+bleaching. Ra and SBS were measured and analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

resultsDemineralization statistically significantly increased Ra (p ≤ 0.003). Post-treatment, G5 exhibited the highest Ra (p 0.001) and SBS (p ≤ 0.010), while G4 had the lowest SBS (p ≤ 0.018). G6 demonstrated Ra comparable to control groups and an average SBS, indicating a favorable balance between surface smoothness and bonding.

conclusionOur findings suggest that the combined use of KI, microabrasion, and bleaching achieved the least statistically significant Ra while maintaining an average SBS, providing superior functional outcomes compared with bleaching or microabrasion alone, making it a promising conservative approach for managing SDF-treated lesions.

Indexed as

Cariostatic AgentsDental CariesQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsSilver CompoundsTooth RemineralizationDental EnamelEnamel MicroabrasionFluorides, TopicalFluoride TreatmentHumansIn Vitro TechniquesPotassium IodideShear StrengthSurface PropertiesTooth BleachingCariostatic AgentsFluorides, TopicalPotassium IodideQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsSilver Compoundssilver diamine fluoridedental cariesenamel microabrasionshear bond strengthsilver diamine fluoridesurface roughnesstoothbleaching

Identifiers

PMID41910230
PMCPMC13034779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.