ReviewWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research2026
Applying machine learning and AI for nanofiltration membranes water applications: a review.
Review in Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanofiltration (NF) has long been the focus of researchers and operators in the field of water and wastewater treatment and desalination. Characterised by both high rejection of diverse substances depending on their molecular composition and charge, and high flux, NF membranes have demonstrated broad applicability while maintaining long-lasting performance. However, NF membrane scalability and reliability are intrinsically constrained by non-linear phenomena like complex solute-rejection mechanisms, long-term fouling dynamics, and the inherent flux-selectivity trade-off. Traditional mechanistic models relying on simplifying assumptions within the solution-diffusion framework, often fail to accurately predict performance in heterogeneous, real-time water matrices, leading to a critical divergence between predictive capability and operational reality. This review addresses this gap by comprehensively assessing the integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) across three critical domains: fabrication optimisation, performance prediction, and fouling diagnosis and mitigation, through the analysis of 100 NF-ML publications over the past 10 years. Additionally, it highlights key methodological challenges including data scarcity and heterogeneity, and lack of robust external validation. Finally, the review emphasises that future advancements lie in reinforcement learning for real-time adaptive control and in hybrid ML-mechanistic frameworks bridging the existing gap between data-driven prediction and transparent mechanistic understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41910105What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.