ArticleTurkish archives of otorhinolaryngology2026
Translation and Validation of the Turkish Parotidectomy Outcome Inventory-8.
Article in Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Salivary gland tumors are common tumors of the head and neck region, and most are located in the parotid gland and the majority are benign. Parotidectomy, which is applied in the treatment of these tumors, is a very specific procedure in terms of both surgical technique and complications. Many quality of life (QoL) questionnaires have been used to evaluate the patient after parotid surgery; however, none are specific to parotidectomy. The Parotidectomy Outcome Inventory-8 (POI-8) was developed and validated in German to measure QoL after parotidectomy in patients with benign tumors. In this study, our aim was to translate POI-8 into Turkish and study its validity and reliability. Methods: Fifty patients had parotidectomy due to benign pathologies and they were included in the study. All participants were administered the Turkish version of the University of Washington QoL questionnaire (UW-QoL), which had previously been validated in Turkish, and the Turkish version of the POI-8, which was prepared with expert committee evaluation. Validity assessment, internal consistency analysis, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability assessment were performed for POI-8. Results: In the Turkish version of POI-8, a high level of intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was detected. A high-level, negative correlation was observed between POI-8 and UW-QoL. A strong internal consistency was detected with a high Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Conclusion: POI-8, which we translated into Turkish and validated, can be used safely by head and neck surgeons to measure QoL after parotidectomy with its high reliability values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.