ArticleMedical care2026
Defining and Measuring Delays in Postacute Care: Toward a Standardized Definition of Rehabilitation Access.
Article in Medical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudying delays in postacute care (PAC) rehabilitation using Medicare data is challenging due to the absence of a standardized definition of PAC access timeframes across rehabilitation provider types.
methodsWe used 100% Medicare claims data for beneficiaries aged 66 and older discharged to PAC with one of 8 common medical conditions. PAC initiation was examined for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), and home health agencies (HHAs). Daily utilization curves were generated for each PAC setting. Joinpoint regression identified the time points where the rate of PAC initiation changed significantly, based on 2019 data. These joinpoints mark thresholds beyond which fewer patients accessed PAC at a slower pace and were used to define delayed access for each setting. We evaluated the stability of joinpoints using 2018 data.
resultsAmong over 8.9 million hospitalizations, IRFs and SNFs showed a consistent joinpoint at day 2 postdischarge. In contrast, HHA access increased more gradually, with a joinpoint at day 12.
conclusionsPatients typically access facility-based PAC (IRF and SNF) within 2 days, whereas initiation of home-based PAC (HHA) occurs around 12 days. These findings on the joinpoint provide empirical evidence to define PAC delay for each setting. However, it also indicates a systemic gap in defining timely postacute transitions, underscoring the need for standardizing the lengths of accessing postacute services with empirical evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.