ReviewInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2026
Health technology assessment in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: an updated SWOT analysis.
Review in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly recognized as a critical tool for evidence-informed decision-making in Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA), a region characterized by substantial diversity in health system maturity, financial resources, and institutional capacities. Building on the previous Eurasian HTA Initiative conducted a decade earlier, this study aimed to update the regional assessment of HTA implementation, expand country representation, and identify evolving strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats affecting the advancement of HTA across the region. An online multilingual survey, informed by the original SWOT framework, was disseminated between August and October 2025 to experts from national authorities, HTA agencies, academia, and health sector stakeholders across eleven EECA countries. Twenty-two responses were analyzed descriptively. Key strengths included strong regional collaboration interest, growing availability of online HTA resources, and sustained global support. Major weaknesses centered on the limited trained HTA/EBM personnel and the absence of standardized national training programs. Opportunities reflected expanding interest in EBM, pressure from rising healthcare costs, and prospects for regional advocacy, educational exchanges, and international collaboration. Principal threats involved insufficient funding for capacity building, low policy-maker and clinician awareness, commercial influence from industry, and limited incentives for EBM uptake. Overall, respondents emphasized gradual progress in selected areas but persistent structural barriers requiring coordinated national and regional action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.