Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909963›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2026

Health technology assessment in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: an updated SWOT analysis.

Rabia Sucu, Antonio Migliore, Nicola Vicari, Esra Meltem Koç, Alima Almadiyeva

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rabia SucuHealth Technology Assessment International, Canada.
Antonio MiglioreHealth Technology Assessment International, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1984-0803
Nicola VicariHealth Technology Assessment International, Canada.
Esra Meltem Koçİzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi İslami İlimler Fakültesihttps://ror.org/024nx4843, Türkiye.
Alima AlmadiyevaHealth Technology Assessment International, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly recognized as a critical tool for evidence-informed decision-making in Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA), a region characterized by substantial diversity in health system maturity, financial resources, and institutional capacities. Building on the previous Eurasian HTA Initiative conducted a decade earlier, this study aimed to update the regional assessment of HTA implementation, expand country representation, and identify evolving strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats affecting the advancement of HTA across the region. An online multilingual survey, informed by the original SWOT framework, was disseminated between August and October 2025 to experts from national authorities, HTA agencies, academia, and health sector stakeholders across eleven EECA countries. Twenty-two responses were analyzed descriptively. Key strengths included strong regional collaboration interest, growing availability of online HTA resources, and sustained global support. Major weaknesses centered on the limited trained HTA/EBM personnel and the absence of standardized national training programs. Opportunities reflected expanding interest in EBM, pressure from rising healthcare costs, and prospects for regional advocacy, educational exchanges, and international collaboration. Principal threats involved insufficient funding for capacity building, low policy-maker and clinician awareness, commercial influence from industry, and limited incentives for EBM uptake. Overall, respondents emphasized gradual progress in selected areas but persistent structural barriers requiring coordinated national and regional action.

Indexed as

Technology Assessment, BiomedicalAsia, CentralCapacity BuildingDecision MakingEurope, EasternHumansInternational CooperationSurveys and QuestionnairesEECAevidence-based decision makingHealth technology assessmentregional collaborationSWOT

Identifiers

PMID41909963
PMCPMC13071842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.