Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909901›Full record

ArticleGut microbes reports2025

Evaluating long-term stool preservation methods for maximizing the recovery of viable human fecal microbiota.

Youzheng Teo, Anton Lavrinienko, Diana Albertos Torres, Paul Tetteh Asare, Antonia Ruder, Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello, Adrian Egli, Nicholas A Bokulich, Pascale Vonaesch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Youzheng TeoDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Anton LavrinienkoDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9524-8054
Diana Albertos TorresInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-3974
Paul Tetteh AsareDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-8489
Antonia RuderDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Maria Gloria Dominguez-BelloDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8879-6159
Adrian EgliInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3564-8603
Nicholas A BokulichDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1784-8935
Pascale VonaeschDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1064-6505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome plays a fundamental role in human health, prompting efforts to catalog and preserve its diversity across human populations. While DNA sequencing dominates microbiome research, cultivation remains essential for mechanistic studies and therapeutic development. However, best practices for long-term stool preservation remain limited. Here, we compared the stability of eight cryopreservation treatments for maintaining viable stool microbiota over a 1-y storage period at -80 °C (freezer) or at -196 °C (liquid nitrogen) using samples from infants, children, and adults. Combining cultivation on six media with 16S rRNA sequencing, we show that ultralow-temperature cryopreservation has a minimal impact on microbiota diversity compared to fresh cultures. Standard glycerol preservation and simple snap-freezing performed comparably to more complex and costly protocols, with all cultured samples retaining donor-specific microbiota profiles after long-term cryopreservation. The lack of strong treatment-specific effects on microbiota composition suggests a shared microbial response to freeze‒thaw stress favoring taxa with broad environmental tolerance. Our findings offer practical, low-cost strategies for stool biobanking. Importance: The cultivation of bacterial taxa from complex communities, such as those in fecal samples, is essential for mechanistic studies and the development of microbiota-based therapeutics, including defined consortia and individual probiotic strains. Such cultivation efforts typically rely on previously stored samples; however, systematic knowledge regarding long-term preservation strategies that ensure the viability and regrowth of constituent bacterial taxa remains limited. In this study, we systematically evaluated 16 distinct cryopreservation conditions to assess their efficacy in maintaining bacterial viability. Our results show that conventional glycerol-based preservation and simple snap-freezing are comparable in performance to more elaborate and cost-intensive protocols. Moreover, we identified the duration of sample transport prior to freezing as a critical determinant of post-thaw bacterial recovery. These findings provide valuable data on the relative effectiveness of various preservation methods and support the use of low-cost, easily implementable strategies that are particularly suitable for application in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

cryopreservationcultivationHuman microbiotalong-term storagestool biobanking

Identifiers

PMID41909901
PMCPMC12940166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.