ReviewGut microbes reports2025
Common microbial signatures in blood and their amplification in clinical disorders.
Review in Gut microbes reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Full-length 16S rRNA nanopore sequencing enables species resolution ofGut microbes · 2026Article
- Blood microbiome signatures in the REM sleep behavior disorder-Lewy body disease continuum.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood microbiome research has emerged as a significant area of study, exploring microbial signatures within the bloodstream and their potential implications for various clinical disorders. This study aimed to identify common microbial signatures in blood across cohorts and investigate how these signatures are altered in clinical conditions. We conducted a meta-analysis of 15 publicly available studies utilizing amplicon sequencing, including 687 control and 651 case individuals with various disorders from diverse geographic locations to compare their blood microbiome profiles. The results revealed that most microbes detected in the blood originated from the gut, oral cavity, and skin, with several genera such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.