ArticleFrontiers in big data2026
FunduScope: a human-centered, machine learning-based interactive tool for training junior ophthalmologists in diabetic retinopathy detection.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Design and application of a web-based intelligent ophthalmic image analysis teaching platform.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interpreting fundus images is an essential skill for detecting eye diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy (DR), one of the leading causes of visual impairment. However, the training of junior doctors relies on experienced ophthalmologists, who often lack the time for teaching, or on printed training materials that lack variability in examples. In this work, we present FunduScope, an interactive human-centered learning tool for training junior ophthalmologists, which is based on a pre-trained ML model for classifying DR. In a qualitative pre-study, we investigated the needs of junior doctors and identified gaps in recent learning procedures. In the main mixed-methods study, we examined the experience of 10 junior doctors with the tool and its impact on cognitive load, usability, and additional factors relevant to e-learning tools. Despite technical constraints our results confirm the potential of using an ML-based learning tool in medical education, addressing the time constraints of ophthalmologists, and providing learning independence for junior doctors. However, future work could extend the learning tool by using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to further support the clinical decision making of learners and exceeding the scope of this proof of concept to other ophthalmic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.