Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909833›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026

Machine learning model for predicting improvement in left ventricular systolic function in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

Nariman Sepehrvand, Caitlyn Gilbert, Alec Chunta, Erik Youngson, Justin A Ezekowitz, Nowell M Fine, Jonathan G Howlett, Finlay A McAlister, Robert J H Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nariman SepehrvandDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Caitlyn GilbertDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Alec ChuntaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Erik YoungsonData and Research Services, Alberta SPOR Support Unit and Provincial Research Data Services, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada.
Justin A EzekowitzCanadian VIGOUR Centre and Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Nowell M FineDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jonathan G HowlettDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Finlay A McAlisterCanadian VIGOUR Centre and Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Robert J H MillerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: About one-third of patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) may demonstrate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery with medical management. In this study, we developed a machine-learning (ML) model to predict LVEF improvement and compared its performance to a logistic regression (LR) model in internal and external validation cohorts. Methods: We identified 3124 patients with HFrEF and ≥2 echocardiograms taken ≥6 months apart. Patients were split into development (n = 1812) and external testing (n = 1312) cohorts by site. The ML and LR models were trained using 49 features, with internal 5-fold cross-validation. Prediction performance and calibration in the internal and external testing cohorts were assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) and Brier score, respectively. Results: LVEF recovery defined as an absolute LVEF increase of ≥10% occurred in 36.0% of the development cohort and 39.8% of the external testing cohort. The ML model performed better in predicting LVEF recovery compared to the LR model in the development cohort (AUC 0.719 vs 0.700, p = 0.045), however, there was no significant difference in external testing (AUC 0.702 vs 0.696, p = 0.498). Lower baseline LVEF and left ventricular dimensions, younger age and non-ischemic etiology contributed the most to the prediction of LVEF improvement. Conclusion: A ML model using readily available clinical and echocardiographic data did not perform better than traditional LR in predicting LVEF improvement when tested externally. Larger studies, including additional variables or alternative approaches, may improve LVEF recovery prediction.

Indexed as

Gradient boostingHeart failureImproved ejection fractionLeft ventricular ejection fractionMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41909833
PMCPMC13018860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.