Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909817›Full record

ArticleResearch methods in medicine & health sciences2023

Challenges and solutions to the implementation of studies within a trial: The experiences of the PROMETHEUS programme.

Catherine E Arundel, Laura Clark, Elizabeth Coleman, Laura Doherty, Adwoa Parker, David J Torgerson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research methods in medicine & health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catherine E ArundelYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, New York, UK.
Laura ClarkYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, New York, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9227-5447
Elizabeth ColemanYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, New York, UK.
Laura DohertyYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, New York, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5310-5808
Adwoa ParkerYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, New York, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2880-3935
David J TorgersonYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, New York, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1667-4275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Effective and efficient conduct of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ensures accurate, timely results and prevents research waste. There is however limited evidence available to inform the design, conduct and reporting of RCTs. A self-contained, randomised Study Within A Trial (SWAT), embedded within a host RCT or cohort study, offers an opportunity to fill this evidence gap. While SWATs are generally easy to implement, a range of challenges to undertaking SWATs have also been identified, however there is limited detail regarding practical solutions to tackle these. Methods: Information and observations collected from PROMETHEUS members and participating trials, focusing on SWATs across a wide range of questions and settings, was reviewed to identify the challenges and solutions of delivery of a programme of SWATs. Results: A range of challenges to undertaking SWATs (e.g., obtaining governance approvals) were identified along with potential solutions to these, which were implemented accordingly during programme delivery. Central to the solutions to resolve SWAT challenges is education to develop knowledge and understanding in the wider research community on the importance, purpose, and key methodological principles in relation to SWATs. In addition, the sharing of experience, best practice or resources to prevent or help negotiate the barriers to undertaking SWAT evaluation is also recommended. Conclusions: Potential solutions to the barriers experienced in the design, conduct and implementation of a programme of SWATs have been identified. As more SWATs are completed, this will further develop evidence to support the mitigation or removal of barriers and in doing so this should increase the efficiency of randomised controlled trials.

Indexed as

basic concepts of researchchallengesmethods and methodologysolutionsStudies within a trialtrial efficiency

Identifiers

PMID41909817
PMCPMC13021119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.