ArticleAerosol and air quality research2026
Site-Specific Calibration of Low-Cost Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 Monitors in the United States: A Comparison of Industrial and Non-Industrial Communities.
Article in Aerosol and air quality research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Particulate matter (PM) poses a significant public health concern, particularly in industrialized communities. While modern sophisticated air monitors like those deployed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) provide accurate 24-h PM2.5 (PM ≤ 2.5 µm) data, limited spatial and temporal coverage may create monitoring gaps. Low-cost monitors, such as a PurpleAir monitor (PA-II), offer an accessible alternative; however, their accuracy can be influenced by local environmental conditions and PM characteristics. This study evaluated the site-specific performance of PA-II in an industrial region within northern Lake County (N = 6) and a suburban region of Tippecanoe County (N = 4), both in Indiana, United States. As a reference measurement, a deployable particulate sampler (DPS) was co-located with each PA-II. For microscopic analysis, PM was collected on a glass substrate. PA-II data were assessed in raw form and following calibration using two methods, with performance assessed by root mean square error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination (R Graphical Abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44408-026-00112-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.