ReviewActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2026
Targeting immunosuppressive network in glioblastoma: Emerging strategies to overcome immunodeficiency and enhance therapeutic efficacy.
Review in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the blood-brain barrier: humanised mice, the missing link in glioblastoma research.Oncogene · 2026Review
- The Hallmarks of Glioblastoma: Functional Interplay Between Long Non-Coding RNAs and RNA-Binding Proteins.Cells · 2026Review
- Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus for Glioblastoma: Molecular Engineering, Tumor Microenvironment Barriers, and Clinical Translation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Glioblastoma: epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and therapeutic resistance.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Breaking the resistance barrier: synergistic evolution of CAR-T cells and bispecific antibodies in the era of precision immuno-oncology.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive primary brain tumor, remains a formidable therapeutic challenge, with a median survival under 15 months. Despite the current standard of care-comprising maximal safe surgical resection, radiotherapy, and temozolomide chemotherapy-patient outcomes have seen minimal improvement over the past two decades. A key barrier to effective treatment is GBM's robust and multifaceted immunosuppressive network, which critically undermines antitumor immunity. While much of the research has focused on the local immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, systemic immunosuppression represents an equally important yet often underappreciated obstacle, significantly impairing host immune competence. Effective immunotherapy relies on an intact and functional immune system capable of mounting durable T cell-mediated responses. However, GBM induces profound systemic immune dysfunction, manifested by severe lymphopenia and depletion of effector immune cells, which further limits immune-mediated tumor control. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of both systemic and local immunosuppressive mechanisms is essential for the rational design of effective immunotherapeutic strategies. In this review, we examine the unique physiological features of the brain, dissect the immunosuppressive landscape of GBM at both local and systemic levels, and highlight recent insights into the underlying mechanisms. We also discuss current immunotherapeutic modalities, and emerging drug delivery strategies aimed at overcoming immunosuppression to improve therapeutic efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.