ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Drug development in psoriatic arthritis: a trialtrove-based landscape analysis (1999-2025).
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous, immune-mediated disease affecting joints, entheses, the axial skeleton, and skin. Although many targeted therapies have emerged, unmet needs remain in musculoskeletal control, comorbidity management, and durable remission. Objective: To map the contemporary clinical-trial landscape of PsA pharmacotherapy and place these data in the context of current evidence, treatment guidelines, regulatory changes, and translational advances. Methods: We analyzed Citeline Trialtrove data on 587 interventional PsA drug trials initiated from 1999 to 2025. Structured variables captured annual trial starts by phase, operational status and outcomes, geographic distribution, funding sources, investigated drugs, molecular targets, and primary endpoints. We characterized trends using descriptive statistics and graphical summaries. To strengthen interpretation of temporal trends, we additionally prespecified count-based trend testing (Poisson/negative binomial regression) and conducted era-stratified summaries (1999-2010 vs 2011-2025) to reflect systemic changes in regulation and transparency. Results: Trial activity was higher after 2012, with increased early-phase programs and sustained phase III/IV development. Most studies reached completion (82.5%); 22.7% disclosed positive outcomes, while many were labeled undefined because of incomplete or non-standardized reporting. Terminations were driven mainly by business decisions rather than lack of efficacy. The United States (US) and China had the highest absolute trial participation, with Europe providing strong multicenter coordination; population-standardized participation (trials per 10 million population) was higher in the US than in China. Funding was diverse: academic institutions (35.3%) and top-20 pharmaceutical companies (32.9%) predominated, alongside smaller industry and generic sponsors. TNF inhibitors such as adalimumab and etanercept were the most frequently tested agents, but substantial activity involved newer mechanisms including IL-17/IL-23, JAK1/TYK2, and PDE4 pathways. Conclusions: Over the past two decades PsA drug development has broadened from TNF blockade to multiple targeted axes, supported by balanced academic-industry sponsorship and a rapidly expanding global footprint. Yet challenges remain-heterogeneous endpoints, incomplete outcome reporting, modest musculoskeletal efficacy in some novel classes, and the need to integrate cost considerations as biosimilars and generics enter routine care. Future trials should prioritize harmonized, domain-specific outcomes, precision patient selection, long-term safety (especially for JAK-pathway inhibitors), and pragmatic, treat-to-target designs to translate mechanistic advances into sustainable, patient-centered therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.