SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Effects of moxibustion therapies on immune function in cancer animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Moxibustion is a key component of traditional Chinese medicine and is widely employed in clinical practice as an adjunctive therapy for cancer. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that moxibustion can modulate host immune function, improve the tumor immune microenvironment, and suppress tumor growth. This study aims to evaluate the effects of moxibustion on immune function in animal models of cancer. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify all animal studies on moxibustion therapy for cancer in English-language databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science) and Chinese-language databases (CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP). Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Statistical analyses were carried out using RevMan 5.4 software. Potential publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plots. Results: The initial literature search identified a total of 2639 potentially relevant studies, of which 48 met the predefined inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis revealed that moxibustion therapy significantly inhibited tumor growth in animal models. Compared with the control group, moxibustion was associated with a significant reduction in tumor volume (SMD = -1.79; 95% CI [-2.59, -0.99]; Conclusion: Although this study has certain limitations, the findings indicate that moxibustion therapy exerts an inhibitory effect on tumor growth in animal models of nine cancer types, including hepatocellular carcinoma, lung cancer, gastric cancer, sarcoma, breast cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer, lymphoma, and colorectal cancer. Moxibustion also increases the spleen index, elevates levels of anti-tumor immune cytokines such as IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, suppresses the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6, and enhances host immune function. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024564223.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.