ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Prognostic benefit of immunosuppressive agents in primary Sjögren's syndrome patients with hypergammaglobulinemia.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To elucidate the prognosis of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) accompanied by hypergammaglobulinemia (HG), with a particular focus on the impact of various treatments. Methods: Patients were divided into the HG group and the non-HG group, based on the presence or absence of HG [serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) level above 16 g/L]. The demographics, clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, medications and outcomes were compared between the two groups. The adverse outcome was defined as death or the increase of Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Damage Index (SSDDI) score. Results: 366 patients were included, with 225 (61.5%) in the non-HG group and 141 (38.5%) in the HG group. Compared with the non-HG group, the HG group had a greater proportion of females, higher disease activity, higher frequencies of organ involvements (excluding interstitial lung disease), and higher rates of autoantibody positivity, hypocomplementemia, and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. After a follow-up of 36 (28-45) months, adverse outcomes were observed in 14 of 141 (9.9%) patients in the HG group and 23 of 225 (10.2%) in the non-HG group. In the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, the risk of adverse outcomes did not differ between the two groups either unadjusted or corrected for conditions such as disease activity. However, compared with non-HG group, the HG group had a lower risk of poor prognosis when using immunosuppressive agents (ISA), and a trend toward a higher risk of poor prognosis when not using (adjusted P for interaction = 0.01). Conclusion: Although the prognosis of pSS patients with HG was comparable to that of non-HG patients in this study, the application of ISA may help to improve the outcome of such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.