ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Global athlete mental health screening: cross-cultural validity of the athlete psychological strain questionnaire.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Coping with Stress in Athletes: Psychological Strategies and Psychometric Tools for Stress and Anxiety Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mental health screening is important across sports cultures, yet recommended tools primarily exist in English. Several translations of the Sport Mental Health Assessment Tool-1 have been published and supported by validation studies; however, it is the Athlete Psychological Strain Questionnaire (APSQ) score that determines whether athletes should continue with the screening process. Objectives: We aimed to investigate the validity of the Romanian APSQ within a representative population and examined the associations between the APSQ score and a range of well-being measures. Methods: 206 Romanian-speaking elite athletes from Romania's national and Olympic teams completed an online questionnaire that included demographic and relevant questions, followed by the APSQ-Ro, the second step of SMHAT-1, and the WHO-5 Well-Being Index. Results: The APSQ-Ro demonstrated good internal consistency, suitable parameters for factorial analysis, a one-factor model with acceptable fit indices, and significant divergent validity with the WHO-5. The APSQ cut-off demonstrated a good sensitivity for depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances, though with low specificity for all mental health problems assessed during SMHAT's second step. When analysing the range of APSQ values, good diagnostic ability (as measured by the area under the curve values) was detected for anxiety and depression. In contrast, poor overall AUC values and AUC at threshold were both identified for drug use and disordered eating. Conclusion: The limited diagnostic capacity for certain problems and the non-significant correlation between the explored variables may be attributed to several factors, including cultural influences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.