ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Emotional labor, well-being, and professional development among university teachers: a qualitative study from a job demands-resources perspective.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This qualitative study explores how university teachers experience and manage emotional labor in relation to their professional well-being and development. Ten teachers from a public research-oriented university took part in semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, guided by the job demands-resources (JD-R) model, emotional labor theory, and research on teacher professional development and identity. Three main themes emerged. First, institutional emotional rules and hidden pressures included expectations to be "always positive" and "always available," the emotional effects of evaluations and performance metrics, and blurred boundaries between work and personal life. Second, navigating emotional labor described how teachers moved between surface acting, deep acting, and selective authenticity, and how these strategies provided both protection and emotional costs over time. Third, emotional labor as professional learning showed how emotionally challenging experiences became turning points, how understandings of care and responsibility changed across career stages, and how peer support and mentoring supported more sustainable ways of working. Overall, the findings suggest that universities need multi-level responses that reduce structural pressures and create shared spaces where teachers can reflect on and discuss the emotional demands of academic work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.