Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909542›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The double-edged role of creativity: silence mechanisms linking workplace incivility to counterproductive work behavior.

Ailin Qiu, Yuming Liu, Zhaoqi Li, MyeongCheol Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ailin QiuDepartment of Economics and Management, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, China.
Yuming LiuDepartment of Information Engineering, Shandong Vocational College of Light Industry, Zibo, China.
Zhaoqi LiDepartment of Business Management, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
MyeongCheol ChoiDepartment of Business Management, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drawing on conservation of resources theory, this study examines how workplace incivility influences CWB through employee silence in technology-mediated work environments while considering the moderating role of employee creativity. Using survey data collected from 487 Chinese employees working in digitally integrated enterprises, this study develops and tests a moderated mediation model in which acquiescent silence and defensive silence function as two parallel mediating mechanisms linking workplace incivility and CWB. The results indicate that workplace incivility significantly increases CWB through both forms of silence, suggesting that employee silence represents a key behavioral pathway through which incivility contributes to individual psychological resource depletion. Moreover, creativity exhibits differential moderating effects across the two indirect pathways. Specifically, creativity strengthens the indirect effect of workplace incivility on CWB via acquiescent silence while weakening the indirect effect via defensive silence. These findings suggest that the behavioral consequences of creativity depend on the type of silence employees adopt in response to incivility. By distinguishing between acquiescent silence and defensive silence, this study advances understanding of employee behavioral response mechanisms in technology-mediated work environments and highlights the context-dependent role of creativity as a psychological resource.

Indexed as

acquiescent silenceconservation of resources theorycounterproductive work behaviorcreativitydefensive silenceworkplace incivility

Identifiers

PMID41909542
PMCPMC13017398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.