Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909532›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026

Real-World Experience with Upadacitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis and Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Dual-Center Case Series.

Fabrizio Martora, Matteo Megna, Elisa Molinelli, Daisy Gambini, Oriana Simonetti, Marianna Cimmino, Maddalena Napolitano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fabrizio Martora *Dermatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2523-050X
Matteo Megna *Dermatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1803-2046
Elisa MolinelliDermatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy.
Daisy GambiniDermatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy.
Oriana SimonettiDermatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy.
Marianna CimminoDermatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Maddalena NapolitanoDermatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3309-8190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disease with significant impact on quality of life and limited effective therapeutic options. Although biologic agents targeting TNF-α and IL-17A are approved for moderate-to-severe HS, many patients exhibit inadequate or unsustained responses. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have recently emerged as potential alternatives. Upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor approved for several immune-mediated disorders including atopic dermatitis (AD), may represent a novel therapeutic strategy. We conducted a real-world case series evaluating the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in 10 patients with severe, refractory AD and/or HS treated at two dermatology centers. Patients received either 30 mg or 15 mg daily without concomitant systemic therapies and were assessed at baseline, 4 months, and 12 months using validated clinical scores. AD outcomes included EASI, Peak Pruritus NRS, and DLQI, while HS outcomes included IHS4, HiSCR, pain VAS, and DLQI. Marked clinical improvement was observed in AD, with progressive reductions in disease severity, pruritus, and quality-of-life impairment over 12 months. In contrast, HS patients demonstrated more modest improvements, with limited achievement of HiSCR despite reductions in IHS4 and pain scores. Treatment was well tolerated, with no reported adverse events. These findings suggest that upadacitinib is highly effective for AD, while its benefit in HS appears less pronounced, highlighting the need for larger controlled studies to better define its therapeutic role in HS.

Indexed as

adalimumabclindamycinJAK1 inhibitorsrifampicintreatment

Identifiers

PMID41909532
PMCPMC13021374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.